It seems to me cessationism is for those who like me were fearful of receiving the Holy Spirit and spiritual gifts or who asked God but never received them. Adherents comforted themselves by adopting the doctrine to explain their lack – a false doctrine that’s rooted in nullification of God’s Word. The appeal of cessationism is that it’s easier than contending with God until He grants your request for more of His Holy Spirit and gifts.

Biblically, the doctrine is rooted in a poor interpretation of the passage “when perfection comes” which holds the Bible itself to be the “perfection” Paul was writing about; found in 1 Corinthians 13:10. Adherents consider tongues and all the other spiritual gifts to have “passed away” when the Bible was completed. Whether “completed” refers to the date the last book was finished or to one of the various canonized versions of the Bible, I’m not sure. Regardless, adherents generally believe spiritual gifts passed away between 1600-1900 years ago. Naturally that puts cessationism at odds with countless living believers who have received the Holy Spirit and practice using spiritual gifts. That leaves them with just 2 choices concerning those who speak in tongues today: admit their doctrine is in error, or persecute them. Sadly, in my experience they have always done the latter and typically with great zeal. If only they realized they are in fact persecuting (and grieving) the Holy Spirit by assailing believers who speak in tongues by the power of the Holy Spirit who dwells within them.

If as I have, you’re wondering why you’ve never heard the gift of tongues in your church, it’s likely that your church isn’t welcoming of the Holy Spirit. That’s the very picture of the Laodicean church in Revelation 3 who by refusing the Holy Spirit shut the door on Jesus who sent Him to us (Revelation 3:20). In simple terms, Laodicean churches are non-charismatic, which is an evasive way of saying that they exclude the Holy Spirit from their services. By definition, when a church self identifies as non-charismatic it means that the manifestations of the Holy Spirit are unwelcome in their services. And since Jesus comes to us through the Holy Spirit, He is shut out of churches that do not welcome the Holy Spirit.

Yet even in Laodicean churches, I’ve met pastors with the gift of tongues, but whose congregations forbade them to use or even mention it. Doubtful they ripped the book of Acts and Paul’s letters out of their pew Bibles, rather, they simply asked their pastors not to preach from the passages that make them uncomfortable. After all, who doesn’t like the love chapter in 1 Corinthians 13? It’s 1 Corinthians 12 and 14 where people get all worked up.

Three times the Lord said “Open wide your mouth and I will fill it” (Psalm 81:10) and each time I responded with fear. When I opened my mouth to give voice to my ignorance for the 3rd time, the Holy Spirit washed over and through me in what felt like a flood of warm pure love. At the same time, it felt as if His hand took hold of my tongue and stretched it out until something hard and lifeless broke off from the end of it and I began speaking in a new language I’d never heard before. Overcome with emotion, tears of joy ran down my face as the words which could only have been highest praise for almighty God rushed from my tongue. For several hours I didn’t speak another word of English except to confess “I can’t believe I ever feared You”.

In Revelation 12:11 John wrote: “They conquered the accuser of the brethren by the blood of the Lamb and by the word of their testimony.”

When it comes to teachings about overcoming the adversary, teachers often seem to ignore Revelation 12:11 and favor Matthew 4:1-11 wherein Jesus rebuked the devil 3 times by reciting scripture. For all the messages I’ve heard and read that admonish believers to do the same, you would think Revelation 12:11 actually said:

They conquered the accuser of the brethren by reciting scripture.

*That’s Bedpan duty D.U.T.Y, not D.O.O.D.Y. If you, if you were wondering, I mean.

About the time a person starts to think they’ve got it all figured out, the Lord will send along a lesson to reset your perspective. For us it was a funny lesson about the power of personality. The small country church we attended for several months wanted to revive a helps ministry known as the “Community Angels”. The woman spearheading the effort was bubbly and enthusiastic about it and my wife responded with excitement in kind. They met and discussed ideas, eventually coming up with a framework for the ministry and a presentation for the congregation to kick it all off.

Jesus washing the disciples feet has often left me wondering whether He intended a greater lesson for us than to simply marvel at His humble servant-hood. It’s John 13 that records the event which says when Jesus had finished washing their feet, He asked:

Do you understand what I have done to you? (John 13:12)

In trying to grasp the significance of what He did, it is well to remember that Jesus remained with the disciples for 40 days following His resurrection. Surely Jesus could have found the time to wash their feet then, rather than on the night of His betrayal. Mere hours before His arrest, trial, flogging and crucifixion, Jesus must have been in emotional agony. Yet, Jesus concern was for the disciples who would be wounded by His death and scattered by the persecution that followed. Jesus knew they would be overcome with guilt and shame for denying Him and therefore potentially reluctant to return and face Him. By washing their feet before they deserted Him, Jesus laid the groundwork of grace and prepared the way for the disciples to be reconciled to Himself. In so doing, Jesus reassured them of His love and the forgiveness that awaited them when eventually they did sin against Him.

That scene where Peter makes his enlightened confession of Christ leads me to ponder. As I recall from scripture, only Peter, James and John witnessed the transfiguration. Before that, the 12, just like everyone else, saw the natural man Jesus, with their natural eyes. Asked “Who do people say that I am?”, there was no risk for the disciples to answer Jesus’ question; they simply repeated what they’d heard. Not once did Jesus say “BZZT! Wrong!” Even when some of the answers were preposterous. “John the Baptist? Someone thought I was John the Baptist? He baptized Me! How could I be him?!?” No, Jesus just listened. But then He asked the $64,000 question; one fraught with risk for the disciples. Did fear of speaking foolishly make for a complete silence? How long did the crickets chirp?

It was Peter who declared what man can see only with eyes opened by God:

“You are the Christ – Son of the Living God”.

How I admire Peter’s willingness to take a risk and get out of the boat again – casting off the safety net of group conformity and boldly declaring his faith.